R v Bateman  EWCA Crim 1333.
The primary issue in this case relates to the distinction between "possession" and "production" within the Sentencing Council Definitive Guidelines on Sexual Assault (possession of indecent photographs of a child).
The Court of appeal, drew the following conclusions from the guidelines:
Dino Massivi & Jennifer Hodge  EWCA Crim 34
Criminal solicitors in London and nationwide, should be aware of the case of Dino Massivi & Jennifer Hodge  EWCA Crim 34.
The absence of sexual gratification or sexual interest in the content of the images, is not a basis for treating a distribution of indecent images offence to a possession of indecent images.
More on indecent images soon.