SOLICITORS SPECIALISING IN SERIOUS OR COMPLEX FRAUD

  • Home
  • About Us
  • FRAUD
  • Legal Advice
  • Ask a Question
  • Policies
  • More
    • Home
    • About Us
    • FRAUD
    • Legal Advice
    • Ask a Question
    • Policies
  • Sign In
  • Create Account

  • My Account
  • Signed in as:

  • filler@godaddy.com


  • My Account
  • Sign out

Signed in as:

filler@godaddy.com

  • Home
  • About Us
  • FRAUD
  • Legal Advice
  • Ask a Question
  • Policies

Account


  • My Account
  • Sign out


  • Sign In
  • My Account
SJ LAW

Criminal defence

Criminal defenceCriminal defence

sentencing in criminal cases

TAKING INTO ACCOUNT FOREIGN SENTENCES

R v Bazegurore & Another  [2020] EWCA   

Good criminal solicitors will be aware that the central issue in these criminal cases, originally heard at Aylesbury Crown Court outside of London, concerns the obligation, if any, upon a court under the Sentencing Council Guidelines, or otherwise, to take account of sentences imposed by foreign courts for similar offences, when sentencing a defendant.

EXTENDED SENTENCES

Robert Baker & Michael Richards [2020] EWCA Crim 176.

Criminal Solicitors, should be aware of the central issue in this  criminal case heard at the Court of Appeal in London, was was whether it was appropriate to take into account the fact that a defendant had been recalled on license and would therefore already be at the hands of the parole board before release and therefore the issue over public protection had already been catered for.


More on Extended Sentences.

WHETHER A RECALL ON LICENSE AMOUNTS TO MITIGATION

Daniel Burtak [2020] EWCA Crim 28

The Court of Appeal, Criminal division sitting in London stated in this case that the Judge should not have taken into account as mitigation, the fact that the defendant had been recalled on license.

Sexual offences

Criminal Solicitors miscarriage cases. SJ Law appeal solicitors.

R v Privett & Others [2020] EWCA Crim 557

Offence: Arranging or facilitating or facilitating the commission of a child sex offence

Act:    S14 Sexual Offences Act 2003

Issue: The correct approach to be adopted in assessing harm for the purpose of sentence.

Summary:

Criminal Solicitors need to be aware of this case for the purpose of sentencing for S14 offences.  Under the Sentencing Guidelines the judge should:

1. Identify the category of harm on the basis of the sexual activity the defendant had intended ; for these purposes, the 3 categories of harm are:


    Category 1

  • Penetration of vagina or anus (using body or object)
  • Penile penetration of mouth

In either case by, or of, the victim

    Category 2

  • Touching, or exposure, of naked genitalia or naked breasts by, or of, the victim

    Category 3

  • Other sexual activity

and then

2. Adjust the sentence in order to ensure it is “commensurate” with, or proportionate to, the applicable starting point and range if no sexual activity had occurred.


Copyright © 2025 SJ LAW - All Rights Reserved.

  • CONCEPTS IN CRIMINAL LAW
  • Drugs Offences
  • Restraint Orders
  • Privacy Policy
  • Encrypted Phones

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies. Privacy Policy

DeclineAccept & Close